|
Re: language of coreutils: msg#00045gnu.core-utils.bugs
Jim Meyering <jim@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Almost all of the existing 89 programs are written in C, > and none are written in C++, so C would be best. > But if you make a good case for using C++, I'll consider it. The GNU coding standards argue for C and against C++; see <http://www.gnu.org/prep/standards_7.html#SEC7>. I'd think that any case for using C++ would have to overcome those objections, too. > I would also consider scripts written in Perl. or Python or Guile? :-) |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | [patch]: fix ia64 SIGSEGV in coreutils 4.5.9: 00045, David Kimdon |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [patch]: fix ia64 SIGSEGV in coreutils 4.5.9: 00045, Jim Meyering |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: language of coreutilsi: 00045, Jim Meyering |
| Next by Thread: | Re: language of coreutils: 00045, Bob Proulx |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |