Re: Experiences with these CMSs

Gergely Nagy wrote:
> Do I mean the current system for managing content? Yes :)
> 
> On Tue, 2006-07-25 at 01:32 +0200, Quim Gil wrote:
>> wgo is currently maintained via CVS/SVN editing the pages directly. No
>> CMS involved. Do you mean checking the requirements against the current
>> system?

Not strictly true - there is a (albeit hacky) template system, and of 
course a system for translating pages (using xslt etc). Of course, since 
the files live in a version control system, we also have a complete 
history of who edited what and when. I still don't think we should rule 
out a good build system that creates static pages. This has the 
advantage of being very secure, and also high performance. The biggest 
problem with it at the moment is that the rebuild process isn't very 
intelligent, so every single file is regenerated, regardless of whether 
or not it has changed.

-Thomas