|
Re: Experiences with these CMSs: msg#00243gnome.marketing
Do I mean the current system for managing content? Yes :) On Tue, 2006-07-25 at 01:32 +0200, Quim Gil wrote: > wgo is currently maintained via CVS/SVN editing the pages directly. No > CMS involved. Do you mean checking the requirements against the current > system? > > > > El dt 25 de 07 del 2006 a les 01:25 +0200, en/na Gergely Nagy va > escriure: > > While we are at it, could someone do an audit of the current CMS against > > the reqs? Thanks |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Experiences with these CMSs: 00243, Quim Gil |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | wgo L10n worflow: 00243, Quim Gil |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Experiences with these CMSsi: 00243, Quim Gil |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Experiences with these CMSs: 00243, Thomas Wood |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |