Re: Experiences with these CMSs

While we are at it, could someone do an audit of the current CMS against
the reqs? Thanks

Greg

On Mon, 2006-07-24 at 13:12 +0200, Gergely Nagy wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-07-24 at 10:48 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote:
> > > http://live.gnome.org/GnomeWeb/CmsRequirements
> > >
> > > We have got by now 5 proposals for evaluation: Drupal, Midgard, eZ
> > > Publish, Plone and Tiki Wiki.
> > 
> > Hopefully "none of these CMSs" (or "Our current hacky system"), is an
> > option. It should be considered in case even the best CMS is not good
> > enough , or is unlikely to ever meet our needs.
> 
> As I said somewhere before, I definitely keep the option open to leave
> the CMS as-is for the current release. I'm convinced that if we rush
> into selecting the wrong CMS we just make things worse. I'd rather not
> have a CMS update every release...