|
Re: Experiences with these CMSs: msg#00232gnome.marketing
On Mon, 2006-07-24 at 10:48 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote: > > http://live.gnome.org/GnomeWeb/CmsRequirements > > > > We have got by now 5 proposals for evaluation: Drupal, Midgard, eZ > > Publish, Plone and Tiki Wiki. > > Hopefully "none of these CMSs" (or "Our current hacky system"), is an > option. It should be considered in case even the best CMS is not good > enough , or is unlikely to ever meet our needs. As I said somewhere before, I definitely keep the option open to leave the CMS as-is for the current release. I'm convinced that if we rush into selecting the wrong CMS we just make things worse. I'd rather not have a CMS update every release... Once we have enough experience with the current candidates, we can decide for the best candidate, and decide on the go--no-go. > Of course, I hope that something does meet our needs. Me too :) Greg |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Writing the 2.16 release notes (and press release): 00232, Murray Cumming |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Writing the 2.16 release notes (and press release): 00232, Gergely Nagy |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Experiences with these CMSsi: 00232, Jeff Waugh |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Experiences with these CMSs: 00232, Quim Gil |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |