Re: The relation with gnomefiles.org

 El dv 14 de 07 del 2006 a les 13:23 +0200, en/na Gergely Nagy va
escriure:

> This is probably necessary to "blend in" with the other gnome sites.

Greg, before you go any further...

gnomefiles.org is *not* a GNOME subsite and has no organic relation or
dependency with the GNOME project. They happen to have *gnome* in their
URL and project name, but it's not like gnomejournal.org or
gnomedesktop.org. Therefore we need to set up a kind of collaboration
not mixing identities and ownership.

I got confused one year ago when digging consciously through *gnome*
subsites on year ago and I bet this is still confusing many users out
there. 

Whatever the collaboration is, we need to make clear this relation.

I was not suggesting of using gnomefiles.org as a substitution of the
GNOME software map we still need, and need to develop ourselves (i.e. to
identify which are official GNOME applications and which are not). I
think we need to have a healthy bridge with gnomefiles.org because it is
possibly the most popular GNOME/GTK+  resource, we need to suport them
because they love what we do  ;)  and they can be a good gateway to get
new active users and contributors.

BTW, just curious. Can someone tell which licenses have VM Player and
VWWare server? It took me a while to figure out in their website and I
still haven't come up with a single license definition for each.

-- 
Quim Gil /// http://desdeamericaconamor.org | http://guadec.org

signature.asc
Description: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Aix=F2?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_=E9s?= una part d'un missatge, signada digitalment