Ho there,
In order to prevent a myriad of problems which would certainly come,
please try to avoid using C++ keywords when naming variables :-)
Ciao
Igor
Hi, Daniel!
This question was discussed some time ago but I could not understand
do we have any agreement or not. And I would like to raise it again
because it looks like I need this functionality too :)
So the question is: can we add "void* private" member to the
"struct xmlNs"?
This pointer will be used by application to store application
specific data
and LibXML will simply always ignore it.
There were two suggestions:
1) make struct xmlNs similar to structures for other
node types and put
"void * private" on the second place (adv.: simplicity
and following
standard; dis. : this breaks binary compatibility)
2) add "void* private" to the end of struct xmlNs (adv.: binary
compatible;
dis.: "special case" for applications)
As far as I can understand, we could not go with option 1) because of
binary
compatibility. I would like to find out, can the implement option 2)
(it's ugly
but it gives me what I want :) ).
Thanks,
Aleksey
_______________________________________________
xml mailing list, project page http://xmlsoft.org/
xml@xxxxxxxxx
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xml
