|
Re: no invisible cursor: msg#00172gnome.gtk+.python
On Mon, 2005-02-28 at 14:45 +0100, Le Boulanger Yann wrote: > I think the doc suggests you to use an empty pixbuf, not to run > gtk.gdk.Cursors() without arguments. > Maybe i'm wrong :/ That is correct. By "gtk.gdk.Cursor()" the documentation meant "one of the valid gtk.gdk.Cursor constructors with an empty cursor". This could probably be phrased better. Ross -- Ross Burton mail: ross@xxxxxxxxxxxxx jabber: ross@xxxxxxxxxxxxx www: http://www.burtonini.com./ PGP Fingerprint: 1A21 F5B0 D8D0 CFE3 81D4 E25A 2D09 E447 D0B4 33DF
pygtk mailing list pygtk@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.daa.com.au/mailman/listinfo/pygtk Read the PyGTK FAQ: http://www.async.com.br/faq/pygtk/ |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: no invisible cursor: 00172, Le Boulanger Yann |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: no invisible cursor: 00172, Ionutz Borcoman |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: no invisible cursori: 00172, Le Boulanger Yann |
| Next by Thread: | Re: no invisible cursor: 00172, Ionutz Borcoman |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |