Re: libnautilus-burn-python on gnome-python-extras?

Ter, 2004-12-14 às 11:45 -0100, Tiago Cogumbreiro escreveu:
> Hello list,
> I've just finished the libnautilus-burn-python bindings, I'm currently
> autotooling them to put'em in a webplace somewhere. Gustavo showed some
> interested in maybe including these bindings in gnome-python-extra. I
> would be really pleased if this would happen! But if it is going to
> happen I would like to know the requirements/guidelines and whatnot.

  I think that sounds good.  CD Burning at your python finger tips
sounds generally good!  ;-)

  But this is just my opinion.  Although I'm the maintainer, not only my
opinion matters.  What do people think?

  I can't think of any requirements beforehand except having relatively
few bugs :)  Hop on to #pygtk in irc.gnome.org if you need to discuss
more.

> 
> However there are some problems with lib-n-b: in the subsequent gnome
> 2.10 they will break binary compatibility. While this is not a big
> problem to the bindings itself, fixing it is not a big problem. And
> since I am following closely the CVS activities there, the bindings API
> already reflect the new one. But they are still not frozen and as such
> minor corrections to the API can occur.

  I don't think that is a problem.  No library wrapped by gnome-python-
extras is API frozen.  That only happens to libraries in gnome developer
platform, wrapped by gnome-python.

> 
> Regards,
> Tiago Cogumbreiro
> 
> _______________________________________________
> pygtk mailing list   pygtk@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.daa.com.au/mailman/listinfo/pygtk
> Read the PyGTK FAQ: http://www.async.com.br/faq/pygtk/
-- 
Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro
<gjc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <gustavo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
The universe is always one step beyond logic.

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
pygtk mailing list   pygtk@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.daa.com.au/mailman/listinfo/pygtk
Read the PyGTK FAQ: http://www.async.com.br/faq/pygtk/