Re: help with non-embedded Bonobo server

James Henstridge wrote:
> the Uploader object here is a Servant object, while the factory function 
> is required to return a bonobo.Object instance.  It is currently not 
> possible to do this for custom interfaces in Python.

:-(

If that requirement is part of the bonobo GenericFactory interface, can 
I instead create my own UploaderFactory interface that is declared to 
return an Uploader object?  If I do that, though, will I still be able 
to use bonobo's activation infrastructure?  Or is the activation 
infrastructure fundamentally tied to GenericFactory and therefore to 
bonobo.Object?

Taking a different approach, what are other examples of (non-custom) 
interfaces for which GenericFactory does work?  I know about 
bonobo.Component, but I assumed that this provides widget embedding 
support which I do not need.  Is there some other bonobo.Object subclass 
that would be a suitable superclass for my service?  (Again, my service 
has a standalone PyGTK GUI in the form of a notification area icon, but 
is not intended for embedding within clients.)

Thanks!

_______________________________________________
pygtk mailing list   pygtk@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.daa.com.au/mailman/listinfo/pygtk
Read the PyGTK FAQ: http://www.async.com.br/faq/pygtk/