|
Re: [omniORB] Re: Conflicting omniORBpy and PyORBit: msg#00122gnome.gtk+.python
On 15/08/03 02:05, Christian Reis wrote: That is exactly what I meant :)In the above reasoning, I am assuming that applications will just run with "any available ORB". I think this is a fairly safe assumption, since apps may:James, don't you really mean "I am assuming that applications *won't* James. -- Email: james@xxxxxxxxxx WWW: http://www.daa.com.au/~james/ _______________________________________________ pygtk mailing list pygtk@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.daa.com.au/mailman/listinfo/pygtk Read the PyGTK FAQ: http://www.async.com.br/faq/pygtk/ |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Re: [pygtk] Conflicting omniORBpy and PyORBit: 00122, James Henstridge |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Getting text entry to print: 00122, Gerardo Arnaez |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Re: [pygtk] Conflicting omniORBpy and PyORBiti: 00122, Christian Reis |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Re: [pygtk] Conflicting omniORBpy and PyORBit: 00122, ml |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |