On Sun, 2004-09-19 at 10:40, Torsten Schoenfeld wrote:
> On Sat, 2004-09-18 at 20:57, Kevin C. Krinke wrote:
>
> > A list-vote maybe?
> >
> > All in favour of one package for the Gtk2::Ex name space vote +1.
> > All in favour of many packages for the Gtk2::Ex name space vote -1.
>
> To make the decision even harder, I'll throw in another possibility:
> Have separate distributions, but offer a bundle to install all of them
> -- like Gavin's Bundle::Gnome2.
Oh great... what are we up to now, option #452? sheesh... :)
So you're suggesting something like:
Gtk2-Ex-Constants
Gtk2-Ex-Utils
Gtk2-Ex-Simple-Dialogs
Gtk2-Ex-Simple-Other_Contribs
and then have a Bundle::Gtk2::Ex?
I kinda like the single package route as it's easier to maintain,
however I can see the benefit to the bundle as well. The only real
complicating factor I can see off-hand is that Gtk2::Ex::Simple::Dialogs
depends upon Gtk2::Ex::Constants... Essentially I feel that if there are
any inter-module dependencies they should probably be packaged together
anyways as to get one you're going to get at least two if not more.
Bleh, I know nothing... brain hitting overload mark... too many
options... GAH!
Alright... we need some sort of consensus here... but before that we
need to know _all_ the options... has anyone else something to add to
the list?
a) One package for Gtk2::Ex::*
b) One package for Gtk2::Ex::* and another for Gtk2::Ex::Simple::*
c) A package for each Gtk2::Ex::* and one bundle Bundle::Gtk2::Ex
d) Give in to the anarchy and let everyone decide for themselves how
they package their stuff but at least agree on name spaces
e) <insert yet another complicated flying monkey wrench here/>
--
Kevin C. Krinke <kckrinke@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Open Door Software Inc.
|
