muppet said:
> my question is, does everybody like this interface? are there any changes
> you'd like to make? are there any changes in GtkItemFactory between 1.2.x
> and 2.x that would necessitate changes?
if i may answer myself... ;-)
in C, you can pass specific callback functions and callback data for each entry.
i seem to recall that in gtk-perl you could use the hash form to pass a
specific callback, but according to the code this is not so.
it would be quite easy to add code to look for "callback" and "callback_data"
members when parsing the hash form, and i think i will go ahead and do that.
however, where would/should these go in the array form?
for those keeping score, i think i've found for gtk2-perl-xs a workaround for
the memory leaks in the gtk-perl implementation of GtkItemFactory --- after
creating the item, immediately retrieve it, and attach a destroy notify with
g_object_data_set_full.
--
muppet <scott@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
