On Sat, 2003-02-15 at 18:14, tom roth wrote:
> On 14 Feb 2003 17:30:10 +0100
> Guillaume Cottenceau <gc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > tom roth <tom@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> >
> > > with the help of misc-examples/treeview.pl i was able to produce a
> > > Listview.
> > > Now i would like to make some of the cells editable.
> > > Is there any codefragments, docu or tutorial ?
> >
> > usually it's nice to try to follow c code examples or api doc.
>
> that requires a knowledges of c syntax that i do not comand.
c has very simple syntax. deceptively so, but a lot less is going on
behind the scenes in C than in any other language except assembly.
> add_items (void)
> {
> Item foo;
>
> g_return_if_fail (articles != NULL);
>
> foo.number = 3;
> foo.product = g_strdup ("bottles of coke");
> foo.editable = TRUE;
> g_array_append_vals (articles, &foo, 1);
> ....
>
> now my problem is: what is this foo.editable business exactly ? I know
> very little about c.
> so my wild guess is, foo is a hash (?) and a pointer of that hash
> then is appended to an array ???
nay. C is *much* simpler than that.
the dot syntax is how you access a member of a "struct", which is a
multi-element structure; you can think of a struct as similar to a perl
hash, except that you cannot add arbitrary elements to a struct at
runtime as you can with a hash.
equivalent perl syntax would be
$foo{editable} = TRUE;
a pointer is roughly analogous to a perl reference. for example
Item * foo;
...
foo->editable = TRUE;
and
$fooref->{editable} = TRUE;
any clearer?
by the way, since the Item type doesn't have a Gtk prefix, i presume
it's something application-specific.
> If i could have this example code (Tree View/Editable Cells of the
> gtk-demo example) in perl syntax, things would be way easier for me.
no argument there, the rationale is that since the gtk-perl API is so
close to the C API that documentation would be largely duplicated, and
about 80% redundant, making a lot of maintenance work for not a whole
lot of return.
just an explanation, not an apology or rationalization.
> If i could read the c code easily, i would probably write my code in
> c.
i can write C code easily, and prefer to write in perl. why? because C
is very explicit, which is nice, because everything is laid out there
and unmistakable, but it also sucks because it's a hell of a lot of
work.
> Anyway this is what i have so far
according to the C API docs for the text cell renderer,
http://developer.gnome.org/doc/API/2.0/gtk/GtkCellRendererText.html
one of the object's properties is "editable", a boolean, read/write
property. my wager is that you just need to set this to 1 on the
renderer you supply for any column you want to be editable.
> # now build the treeview widget
> $widgets->{'treeview1'} = new Gtk2::TreeView;
> $widgets->{'treeview1'}->set_headers_visible('1');
>
> $forms->{'dialog1'}{'scrolledwindow2'}->add_with_viewport($widgets->{'treeview1'});
>
> my $cell = Gtk2::CellRendererText->new;
# tell this renderer that its cells are to be editable
$cell->set_property ("editable", 1);
> my $column = Gtk2::TreeViewColumn->new_with_attributes("No",
> $cell, 'text' => 0);
# create a new renderer to use for the remaining
# cells, which are *not* to be editable.
my $cell = Gtk2::CellRendererText->new;
> $widgets->{'treeview1'}->append_column($column);
> my $column1 =
> Gtk2::TreeViewColumn->new_with_attributes("Name", $cell, 'text' => 1);
> $widgets->{'treeview1'}->append_column($column1);
> my $column2 =
> Gtk2::TreeViewColumn->new_with_attributes("Start", $cell, 'text' => 2);
> ...
> $widgets->{'treeview1'}->set_model($model);
> $widgets->{'treeview1'}->show;
does that work?
--
muppet <scott@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
