On 14 Feb 2003 20:08:40 -0800
"Shahms E. King" <shahms@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > [...] get libgdome to compile without glib. So that it
> > and software based on it will even work on windows systems.
> >
> > T
>
> Um, the point of glib is to be a portable utility library. And, in
> fact, does run on windows.
Please reread my statement. It was not about glib (unspecified version)
running on windows or not, but about libgdome. libgdome depends on glib
1.2, which never ran on windows.
I know what I'm speaking about. In the past, I developed two working
ports of libgdome to windows (see mailing list archives). But I can no
longer legally distribute these ports. Show me a working, distributable
libgdome binary for windows within a week and I _will_ be impressed.
T
|
