|
Thinking about a new decentralized/serverless IM protocol: msg#00134gnome.gaim.devel
I'm thinking about a new decentralized/serverless IM protocol but I don't want to reinvent the wheel so I'd like to base it on some already working IM protocol. The main goal of the protocol would be: - no centralized user registry - no centralized servers - end-to-end cryptography & security If you were to choose an IM protocol to base this new protocol, what would be it? Is there some IM protocols comparison where I can find some information about problems of the current protocols to avoid them? (A comparison of all the features of the protocols would be great!) Since the protocol is serverless I'll need status to be polled from every user (instead saving the status and having each buddy poll the server) What protocols are the most serverless? I'm mainly asking for things to avoid and things to reuse. If anyone knows references to some not centralized IM protocol it would be appreciated. (I already saw http://instantp2p.jxta.org/ but that still needs a centralized user registry and my protocol won't need that) Eduardo ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Issue with proxied HTTP connections: 00134, Erik Chakravarty |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Thinking about a new decentralized/serverless IM protocol: 00134, Luke Schierer |
| Previous by Thread: | Buddy icon not stable with ICQi: 00134, Pierre Lagrange |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Thinking about a new decentralized/serverless IM protocol: 00134, Luke Schierer |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |