|
Re: Template for GNOME man pages.: msg#00114gnome.documentation
<quote who="Pat Costello"/> > Yes, basically, man pages are a requirement for executables, to give a > list of options, eegees, exceptions, cop-outs, and come-ons. Well, maybe > not the latter. But in general, the sort of stuff that goes into a man > page would be too nitty-gritty for standard user documentation. As an aside, for everyone else's benefit, Sun has a long-standing reputation for crackerjack man pages. They're really, really good. Stuff like pointing to configuration files, other related files (like logs, locks, etc)... Like Pat says, the nitty gritty. Admins feel very comfortable having this stuff to hand. :-) - Jeff -- "If you want to start a debate on a subject, however, all that seems to be necessary is to involve perennial target Richard Gooch." - LWN |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Template for GNOME man pages.: 00114, Jeff Waugh |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Usability]GNOME 2.2 UI Review Time: 00114, Calum Benson |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Template for GNOME man pages.i: 00114, Pat Costello |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Template for GNOME man pages.: 00114, Telsa Gwynne |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |