Re: Documentation on the New GNOME Website

Forgot to Cc webhackers, especially MISTER STEVE FOX!

:-)

<quote who="Jeff Waugh">

> GDP documentation is going to be a big part of the New GNOME Website
> (capitalised due to STRENGTH OF MYTHICAL PROPORTIONS), given that docs can
> be seamlessly integrated into the site structure/design, and much of w.g.o
> would be better maintained as docbook articles or books.
> 
> Certainly smaller, less modified stuff should be kept as HTML, but for
> things like the FAQs, user guides, and other more solid documentation, I'd
> love to have the GDP involved to work out what's lacking from the current
> site.
> 
> API docs are pretty much covered, so I'm just interested in the user
> oriented things.
> 
> Thoughts? I'd love to compile a list of existing documentation that should
> be integrated, and 'stuff wot needs to be written'.
> 
>   (By the way, I've been poking through yelp and large gobs of the GNOME 2.x
>   documentation again recently... FAR OUT it's awesome. You guys are doing a
>   great job. Thank you!)

-- 
     "Perdon; estoy buscando mis pantalones." - Luis Villa's Essential      
                                  Spanish