Re: 'org chart'

On Wed, 2002-10-16 at 08:37, John Fleck wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-10-16 at 06:04, Calum Benson wrote:
> > On Wed, 2002-10-16 at 02:32, John Fleck wrote:
> > 
> > > The glossary ("word list"?) is part of the style guide. Also, I don't
> > > think of reviewing all of the software for style guide compliance as our
> > > gig, just the documentation.
> > 
> > >From a personal point of view, and ignoring things like the number of
> > hours in the day, I actually think it's important that the docs people
> > *do* review UIs for documentation styleguide compliance, and indeed for
> > general sanity-- if something's hard to document, there's a pretty good
> > chance it's hard to use.  (This isn't to say that the UI guys shouldn't
> > have a certain level of familiarity with the doc styleguide as well, of
> > course.)
> > 
> > The docs guys were invaluable during the 2.0 ui-review, and hopefully
> > they will be in the 2.2 ui-review too...

I'm glad to hear people are thinking about the 2.2 ui-review :)

> Calum makes a good point. We inevitably end up reviewing the UI as we're
> writing the docs. So:
>       * review all GNOME documentation and UI for documentation style guide
> compliance?

This sounds fine to me; I'll adjust my version to suit.

Luis