|
Re: Popup Blocker UI: msg#00041gnome.apps.epiphany
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Reinout van Schouwen wrote: | On Fri, 12 Mar 2004, Adam Hooper wrote: |>That's an interesting idea. One important reason: popups are really a |>webpage-specific thing. If you've got 5 browser windows open, each with |>2 tabs with 2 popups, | | | Using tabs and a statusbar icon already breaks the | webpage-"specificity"(sp?) of the popup blocker, unless you'd alter the | content of the menu depending on which tab has focus. I already do that. It's just like the 'Security' icon (nifty, since it's right next to it :P). |>something important, for example, I'd *expect* the notification area to |>have an icon -- and it could be blocking some part of my important |>research but I'd never notice because I'd assume the blocked popups are |>from the porn site. | | | You have a point, but then again: how many popups appear on sites that you | aren't actively browsing at that moment? Is this a common enough use case | to warrant designing features around? Here we go: - - Open tab A (for Anal). Click on a nasty-looking site. It takes a long time to load. - - While waiting, open tab B (for Boobs). Boobs are more popular and the servers are better, so you get instant gratification as you click around. Click on some link. - - As the new page is quickly loading in tab B, tab A finally connects to its server and starts downloading content, including (of all things) a popup C (use your imagination for what C stands for). The problem: Popup C originates from tab A, but it looks to the user like it comes from tab B, since it popped up while tab B was loading. This situation will happen very often, regardless of sites' content. The downside with my setup right now is that the user does not see that *any* popups opened from tab A until he switches back to tab A. But that's a design decision. Is it the right one? I dunno, but it's the one I made temporarily. Anybody have objections? Now's the time to let me know :). |>whether there's a toolbar widget or not, I still need to put the option |>somewhere else as well. | | | If a menu item isn't good enough, and a toolbar item isn't good enough, | what's left? I was thinking maybe a more easy-to-find menu entry. The entry is a verb right now, whereas I consider it to be noun. Would, say, "View -> [x] Popups from this site" be better? I still don't think that's enough of an improvement though. - -- Adam Hooper adamh@xxxxxxxxx -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAUiAiD7ySSW2J9egRAhvWAKCR4sQk4TwvJGvtvGfbAEsfalkDRQCfcqGD 2XCtTZ5XXNBZ8k+WwZdERCo= =Em7O -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Requested feature] epiphany-browser: save page with relative URLs: 00041, Adam Hooper |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Popup Blocker UI: 00041, Reinout van Schouwen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Popup Blocker UIi: 00041, Reinout van Schouwen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Popup Blocker UI: 00041, Reinout van Schouwen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |