|
Re: Epiphany 1.1.11: msg#00010gnome.apps.epiphany
Quoting John Guchemand: Hi John, > I am new to the list, and rather new to programming. I just opened the > link to the Epiphany web site, and found that in Netscape 4x it is > unreadable. In IE6 it looks OK, but it still could use some work. Nearly all Gnome-related web pages are based on XHTML and CSS, so the Epiphany web page. Netscape 4.x was written in the days of HTML 4; CSS were supported on a very basic level only, so it just can't display a page using these new standards properly. But the site is usable (I checked this with Netscape 4.05 on AIX): content is readable and navigation works. It just doesn't look as nice as in one of today's browsers. Regarding MS browsers, I usually check my work using IE 5.5 and IE 6 to see if it looks ok, but that's all: I'm not willing to mess up a web page with workarounds for one company's very own way of dealing with web standards. For example I'm strictly against using GIFs just because MS seems to be unable to properly support transparent PNGs. Regards, Stefan |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Epiphany 1.1.11: 00010, Adam Hooper |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Epiphany Extensions 0.7.1: 00010, Markus Bertheau |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Epiphany 1.1.11i: 00010, Adam Hooper |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Epiphany Extensions 0.7.1: 00010, Markus Bertheau |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |