logo       

Re: Killed $PRODUCT-maint@xxxxxxxxx aliases: msg#00122

gnome-infrastructure

Subject: Re: Killed $PRODUCT-maint@xxxxxxxxx aliases

On 7/31/09, Olav Vitters <olav@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[...]
> > You could parse MAINTAINERS file or DOAP by hand for mail addresses to
> > include, but having a mail alias ready would be so much handier.
>
> I was thinking to have a site where this information is visible. Were
> you aware of the aliases? Meaning: is it important for you to get the
> outdated ones back, or you want it in some time in the future?

Outdated aliases are of course not useful. I was thinking more of the
latter. If something automatically parses DOAP and produces
MODULENAME-maint@xxxxxxxxx aliases, and we document the fact that
those aliases exist, then I do not think listing all aliases is
needed. Some maintainers might worry about spam and such, so having a
listing is probably best avoided.


Christian
_______________________________________________
gnome-infrastructure mailing list
gnome-infrastructure@xxxxxxxxx
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-infrastructure

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Google Custom Search

News | Mail Home | sitemap | FAQ | advertise