|
Re: GNOME Bugzilla Upgrade: Test Upgrade On Friday?: msg#00071gnome-infrastructure
Owen Taylor wrote: We do actually have two much newer and nicer machines that are not at> [snip] Oh yeah! Wow, those sound great! vbox.gnome.org is currently hosting (virtualized) git.gnome.org and That's exactly what a Bugzilla web head is--CPU/memory intensive without much I/O. Of course, if the DB goes onto a separate server, there should ideally be a 1GB connection between the machines or better--I assume that's the case between vbox and drawable? Do we want to have a single big "db.gnome.org" and host all the GNOME I suspect that performance-wise, it'd be best to just have a single enormous db.gnome.org. I've yet to see high-end database performance out of a VM, and high-end performance is ideally what we'd like to see for Bugzilla (not because it does thousands of operations per second, but because Bugzilla's Search functionality is very intensive). An ideal situation is for there to be two database servers--one master and one slave (both for backup reasons and for performance reasons--Bugzilla can do read-intensive operations on the slave), but again, I think the performance penalty of having them in a VM might outweigh the advantage of having two separate machines. That's all we'd really need to know to allocate an IP and do the initial I'll see if I can get Mozilla's MySQL configuration that they use for their current Bugzilla servers, for that last bit. -Max -- Max Kanat-Alexander Chief Engineer http://www.everythingsolved.com/ Everything Solved: Complete Computer Management _______________________________________________ gnome-infrastructure mailing list gnome-infrastructure@xxxxxxxxx http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-infrastructure
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
| News | Mail Home | sitemap | FAQ | advertise |