Re: awareness/matter

Jim, I don’t mean to intrude on your conversation, but did you mean to say “...awareness is not necessary for representation...” ?


On 1/6/08 8:35 AM, "Jim Piat" <piat325@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I think Peirce held that representation was not necessary for awareness, but I've yet to find the any textual support.  Frankly I'd be pleased to find out I was mistaken because I don't personally agree with this view.  But I'll keep looking.  Meantime I thought the passage Jon kindly supplied was relevant and worth passing along.  


-- 
   R. Jeffrey Grace
   www.rjgrace.com
   rjgrace@xxxxxxx

---

You are currently subscribed to peirce-l as: gspp-peirce-l@xxxxxxxxxxx.

To unsubscribe click here: http://lyris.ttu.edu/u?id=35139.776f2133216e85c918fc4ca650118d24&n=T&l=peirce-l&o=201297

(It may be necessary to cut and paste the above URL if the line is broken)

or send a blank email to leave-201297-35139.776f2133216e85c918fc4ca650118d24@xxxxxxxxxxxxx