|
[OSM-dev] Fw: DBF files (shapefile) and OSM tags: msg#00133gis.openstreetmap.devel
>The columns in a shapefile's attributes have a fixed width, and that >width is reserved for each shape. So the space usage will be >approximately equal between using a single, concatenated column and >multiple columns. >What did you intend to gain by concatenating the columns? What I was wondering about in particular was how to make the shapefile DBF file fit in with OSM's data format (where there is technically a limitless number of valid tags). Having one attribute column per OSM tag would presumably mean that any shapefile generating application would only be able to use a particular subset of tags. Has anyone else thought of this issue? I guess the best solution would just be to use the most commonly-used tags. Nick _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OSM-dev] DBF files (shapefile) and OSM tags: 00133, Kristian Thy |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OSM-dev] Fw: DBF files (shapefile) and OSM tags: 00133, Jochen Topf |
| Previous by Thread: | [OSM-dev] DBF files (shapefile) and OSM tagsi: 00133, Nick Whitelegg |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OSM-dev] Fw: DBF files (shapefile) and OSM tags: 00133, Jochen Topf |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |