Re: [OSM-dev] negative segment id in planet.osm? planet-061205.osm

Andreas Brauchli wrote:
> isn't the table marked unsigned? in this case there'd be a displaying
> error: in binary the bit 0 (first bit) is used to set the sign, if the
> number grew over the "positive"-range, then it may be incorrecty
> displayed as negative even if it's a positive number..

shouldn't the IDs be 64 bits unsigned integers ?
did we already pass the 2 Billion segments created ? or is this yet 
another wierd mysql issue ?
</troll>