osdir.com
mailing list archive

Subject: Re: FW: Licensing image catalog ID 10100100018E8E01 - msg#00007

List: gis.geowanking

Date: Prev Next Index Thread: Prev Next Index
I'm former DG, and there were *endless* debates internally about where DG saw itself in the marketplace. The eventual consensus was that DG would focus on producing raw materials (pixels), and cede the "value-add" market (like consumer-focused web consumption) to those that were interested. Google was the first one to step up, and exclusivity was a big part of the contract negotiations.

GlobeXplorer (http://www.globexplorer.com/) is another commercial provider that you might want to look into. They really seem to "get it" when it comes to rasters via the web. They offer OGC/WMS access to their catalog on a metered basis (in addition to more traditional discrete purchase/download), and resell pixels from many other producers (GeoEye, AirPhotoUSA, et al) in addition to DG. From what I can see, they have 1m AirPhotoUSA pixels from 2000. I don't know about the size of your budget, but you can always contract with these companies directly to fly specific AOIs for you if they don't have it in their catalog.

It sounds like you are interested in hi res stuff, but there is always medium res LandSat to fall back on -- http://www.hawaii.gov/ dbedt/gis/data/landsat_meta.htm . Terraserver-usa (http:// www.terraserver-usa.com/) has hi res of only the continental US, but at least they have topos of Hawaii. I don't know if USGS flew Hawaii, but if they did the imagery should be free, albeit a bit dated (late 1990s, early 2000s).

If you haven't already, I'd start looking into state/city/county gov't sources (Department of Transportation, Department of Agriculture, local USGS offices) or University departments (GIS/Civil Engineering/Ag) to see if they have any offerings. If so, they might actually be gratis. NASA might have some hidden gems as well.

http://goes.higp.hawaii.edu/hawaii/
http://satftp.soest.hawaii.edu/space/hawaii/navnew/navigator.html
http://satftp.soest.hawaii.edu/space/hawaii/index_orig.html

HTH,
s

Scott Davis
scott@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx



On Aug 1, 2006, at 12:48 PM, Ben Discoe wrote:

FYI..

It appears that Google licensed ALL of DigitalGlobe's imagery on an
_exclusive_ basis for online presentation. So if i wanted to do something
on a website, with DigitalGlobe's hi-res imagery, for example if the Google
Maps framework isn't flexible enough, i cannot legally go around Google to
license the image myself! I can imagine why Google did this - to prevent
Microsoft,Mapquest etc. from licensing the same imagery in their webmapping
frameworks - but the net effect is that ordinary people, NGOs and small
companies are also cut off.

This seems to skirt the edge of 'do no evil'.

I thought it was interesting and friendly, that DigitalGlobe openly referred
me to their competitor GeoEye (Space Imaging Ikonos/OrbImage OrbView).

In this particular case, DigitalGlobe (QuickBird) has the only hi-res
cloud-free image in existence for my part of the world (Hawaii). So i
cannot go to any other source.

-Ben

-----Original Message-----
From: DigitalGlobe Customer Service [mailto:info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2006 5:13 AM
To: Ben Discoe
Subject: RE: Licensing image catalog ID 10100100018E8E01

Hi Ben,

You are correct in what you say below. Google has signed an exclusive
agreement with us to display our full-resolution imagery on the web.
There are a few exceptions - for instance media and state government - but
this is a rule that is even stated in our licenses.

If you intend to use the imagery on your website, I would suggest contacting
GeoEye as they might be able to provide you with the data you seek.

Best,
Brock

Brock Adam McCarty
Sales Engineer
Commercial Business Unit

DigitalGlobe, Inc.
1601 Dry Creek Dr., #260
Longmont, CO 80503

Office: (303) 684-4323
Cell: (720) 470-7988


-----Original Message-----
From: Ben Discoe [mailto:ben@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2006 12:13 AM
To: DigitalGlobe Customer Service
Subject: RE: Licensing image catalog ID 10100100018E8E01

Hi Brock,

Our agreement with Google Earth does not allow for imagery to be
posted to the web with less than 10-meter resolution.

That's a bit mysterious then. Using either Google Earth or Google Maps, one
can easily zoom into Hawaii to sub-meter resolution. The imagery displayed
on our part of the island is definitely the DigitalGlobe scene i mentioned
(catalog ID 10100100018E8E01) at 0.6 meter resolution.

For example, geocoding my house:
http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&hl=en&q=46-4091+old+mamalahoa+hwy, +honokaa+H
I +96727&ie=UTF8&t=k&om=1&ll=20.054611,-155.507349&spn=0.004062,0.005611

You can see the high resolution, and at the bottom of the window it confirms
"Imagery (C) 2006 DigitalGlobe".

The exact same imagery appears in Google Earth.

Could you possibly send me the price list?

Thanks,
Ben

-----Original Message-----
From: DigitalGlobe Customer Service [mailto:info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, July 31, 2006 2:13 PM
To: Ben Discoe
Subject: RE: Licensing image catalog ID 10100100018E8E01

Hi Ben,

Thanks for the information below.

I must have forgotten to attach the price list.

Regardless, I was not aware of the intended use for the imagery. Our
agreement with Google Earth does not allow for imagery to be posted to the
web with less than 10-meter resolution. As such, I do not think our imagery
is really going to meet your needs.

As you are a non-profit, you might be able to convince Google to allow for
this application. I do not have a contact at Google I work with so this
might be a challenge to pull off.

Best,
Brock


_______________________________________________
Geowanking mailing list
Geowanking@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.burri.to/mailman/listinfo/geowanking


Was this page helpful?
Yes No
Thread at a glance:

Previous Message by Date: click to view message preview

Fwd: new blog on location portals

I thought this might be interesting to some GW's. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Michael Lenczner <mlenczner@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Aug 1, 2006 2:56 PM Subject: new blog on location portals To: Volontaires Ile sans Fil <volontaires@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, WiFiDog Captive Portal <WiFiDog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Discussion list for wirelesstoronto." <wirelesstoronto-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, nycwireless@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Cc: Sascha Meinrath <sascha@xxxxxxxxx>, Sean Savage <seansavage@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jo Walsh <jo@xxxxxxxx>, Anthony Townsend <atownsend@xxxxxxxx>, Saul Albert <saul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Michelle Kasprzak <michelle@xxxxxxxxxxx>, marct <mt@xxxxxxx>, Anne Galloway <anne@xxxxxxxx>, Michael Longford <longford@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Tracey P. Lauriault" <tlauriau@xxxxxxxx> Hello and sorry for the cross-postings. I've been working with Ile Sans Fil and our FOSS project WifiDog for 3 years now. Our goal was always to use our wireless infrastructure to support local communities *beyond* getting them access to the internet. Transforming the captive portal into a location portal always was a large part of that achieving that goal. There's been some great work since then - notably Jo Walsh's work for WirelessLondon and Sean Savages PlaceSite, as well as Wireless Toronto's application of WifiDog - but there is a lot more potential in this particular user interaction. I've just started a blog devoted to the subject of location portals - how to build them, how to intelligently discuss and criticize them. Over the next couple of months I'll be reviewing the existing applications and visions as well as asking some of the people working in this area to share their thoughts - either in one-off's or as permanent guest-bloggers. I look forward to discussing these questions with those of you who are interested. I think some more attention and collaboration on this specific question can have an important impact on the CWN movement, as well as simply improving another worthwhile tool for mobile (and remote) users. http://www.locationportals.net michael lenczner

Next Message by Date: click to view message preview

Re: Historic Topo Maps of Northeast US

Derrick J Brashear writes: > Damn, no one told him that I joined copies of the PA maps. Ouchie. Yeah, well, I hadn't heard about his work until I spotted it on railroad.net, so I thought I'd make a bigger stink about it than he has. You could have solved the problem of world peace, but unless you tell lots of somebodies about it, it doesn't actually get put into practice. -- --my blog is at http://blog.russnelson.com | When immigration is Crynwr sells support for free software | PGPok | outlawed, only criminals 521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315-323-1241 | will immigrate. Illegal Potsdam, NY 13676-3213 | Sheepdog | immigration causes crime.

Previous Message by Thread: click to view message preview

FW: Licensing image catalog ID 10100100018E8E01

FYI.. It appears that Google licensed ALL of DigitalGlobe's imagery on an _exclusive_ basis for online presentation. So if i wanted to do something on a website, with DigitalGlobe's hi-res imagery, for example if the Google Maps framework isn't flexible enough, i cannot legally go around Google to license the image myself! I can imagine why Google did this - to prevent Microsoft,Mapquest etc. from licensing the same imagery in their webmapping frameworks - but the net effect is that ordinary people, NGOs and small companies are also cut off. This seems to skirt the edge of 'do no evil'. I thought it was interesting and friendly, that DigitalGlobe openly referred me to their competitor GeoEye (Space Imaging Ikonos/OrbImage OrbView). In this particular case, DigitalGlobe (QuickBird) has the only hi-res cloud-free image in existence for my part of the world (Hawaii). So i cannot go to any other source. -Ben -----Original Message----- From: DigitalGlobe Customer Service [mailto:info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2006 5:13 AM To: Ben Discoe Subject: RE: Licensing image catalog ID 10100100018E8E01 Hi Ben, You are correct in what you say below. Google has signed an exclusive agreement with us to display our full-resolution imagery on the web. There are a few exceptions - for instance media and state government - but this is a rule that is even stated in our licenses. If you intend to use the imagery on your website, I would suggest contacting GeoEye as they might be able to provide you with the data you seek. Best, Brock Brock Adam McCarty Sales Engineer Commercial Business Unit DigitalGlobe, Inc. 1601 Dry Creek Dr., #260 Longmont, CO 80503 Office: (303) 684-4323 Cell: (720) 470-7988 -----Original Message----- From: Ben Discoe [mailto:ben@xxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2006 12:13 AM To: DigitalGlobe Customer Service Subject: RE: Licensing image catalog ID 10100100018E8E01 Hi Brock, > Our agreement with Google Earth does not allow for imagery to be > posted to the web with less than 10-meter resolution. That's a bit mysterious then. Using either Google Earth or Google Maps, one can easily zoom into Hawaii to sub-meter resolution. The imagery displayed on our part of the island is definitely the DigitalGlobe scene i mentioned (catalog ID 10100100018E8E01) at 0.6 meter resolution. For example, geocoding my house: http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&hl=en&q=46-4091+old+mamalahoa+hwy,+honokaa+H I+96727&ie=UTF8&t=k&om=1&ll=20.054611,-155.507349&spn=0.004062,0.005611 You can see the high resolution, and at the bottom of the window it confirms "Imagery (C) 2006 DigitalGlobe". The exact same imagery appears in Google Earth. Could you possibly send me the price list? Thanks, Ben -----Original Message----- From: DigitalGlobe Customer Service [mailto:info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Monday, July 31, 2006 2:13 PM To: Ben Discoe Subject: RE: Licensing image catalog ID 10100100018E8E01 Hi Ben, Thanks for the information below. I must have forgotten to attach the price list. Regardless, I was not aware of the intended use for the imagery. Our agreement with Google Earth does not allow for imagery to be posted to the web with less than 10-meter resolution. As such, I do not think our imagery is really going to meet your needs. As you are a non-profit, you might be able to convince Google to allow for this application. I do not have a contact at Google I work with so this might be a challenge to pull off. Best, Brock

Next Message by Thread: click to view message preview

RE: FW: Licensing image catalog ID 10100100018E8E01

Scott, First, thanks for a long detailed message, and for filling in the story about what happened with Google and DigitalGlobe. It's fascinating to learn. I certainly did check out GlobeExplorer, the Hawaii State GIS site, TerraServer, and every other source of Hawaiian geodata. In fact, i've been studying the subject for 8 years, http://vterrain.org/Hawaii/ in case you're curious. In this case, there are no truecolor aerial orthophotos available for this island, at all. It's frustrating, as virtually every other part of the USA has at least something. Apparently, it's really hard to capture cloud-free imagery here. Multiple government contracts with large firms have failed to produce complete aerial coverage. (Gory details on my site). USGS has tried. USDA has tried. That's why it was so exciting to learn that DigitalGlobe just made available really great-looking, crisp 60cm pan-merge ... and so frustrating to learn that it's tied up in a Google exclusive license. The '1m AirPhotoUSA pixels from 2000', i can tell from a glance, are actually the color-shifted CIR Emerge data, commisioned by USDA AFPO. There were actually captured from 2001-2003, and as CIR they are public data. AirPhotoUSA apparently ran them through an algorithm to (poorly) approximate truecolor, then licensed the derived product with their copyright. The 1m on the Emerge is nominal, as they are very blurry, usable resolution is much lower. It's also got a big missing chunk for 1/4 of the neighborhood here. Thanks, Ben > -----Original Message----- > From: Scott Davis > Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2006 9:27 AM > To: geowanking@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [Geowanking] FW: Licensing image catalog ID > 10100100018E8E01 > > I'm former DG, and there were *endless* debates internally > about where DG saw itself in the marketplace. The eventual > consensus was that DG would focus on producing raw materials > (pixels), and cede the "value-add" market (like > consumer-focused web consumption) to those that were > interested. Google was the first one to step up, and > exclusivity was a big part of the contract negotiations. > > GlobeXplorer (http://www.globexplorer.com/) is another > commercial provider that you might want to look into. They > really seem to "get it" when it comes to rasters via the web. > They offer OGC/WMS access to their catalog on a metered basis > (in addition to more traditional discrete purchase/download), > and resell pixels from many other producers (GeoEye, > AirPhotoUSA, et al) in addition to DG. From what I can see, > they have 1m AirPhotoUSA pixels from 2000. I don't know about > the size of your budget, but you can always contract with > these companies directly to fly specific AOIs for you if they > don't have it in their catalog. > > It sounds like you are interested in hi res stuff, but there > is always medium res LandSat to fall back on -- > http://www.hawaii.gov/dbedt/gis/data/landsat_meta.htm . > Terraserver-usa (http://www.terraserver-usa.com/) has hi res > of only the continental US, but at least they have topos of > Hawaii. I don't know if USGS flew Hawaii, but if they did the > imagery should be free, albeit a bit dated (late 1990s, early 2000s). > > If you haven't already, I'd start looking into > state/city/county gov't sources (Department of > Transportation, Department of Agriculture, local USGS > offices) or University departments (GIS/Civil Engineering/Ag) > to see if they have any offerings. If so, they might actually > be gratis. NASA might have some hidden gems as well. > > http://goes.higp.hawaii.edu/hawaii/ > http://satftp.soest.hawaii.edu/space/hawaii/navnew/navigator.html > http://satftp.soest.hawaii.edu/space/hawaii/index_orig.html > > HTH, > s > > Scott Davis > scott@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > On Aug 1, 2006, at 12:48 PM, Ben Discoe wrote: > > > FYI.. > > > > It appears that Google licensed ALL of DigitalGlobe's imagery on an > > _exclusive_ basis for online presentation. So if i wanted to do > > something on a website, with DigitalGlobe's hi-res imagery, for > > example if the Google Maps framework isn't flexible enough, > i cannot > > legally go around Google to license the image myself! I > can imagine > > why Google did this - to prevent Microsoft,Mapquest etc. from > > licensing the same imagery in their webmapping frameworks - but the > > net effect is that ordinary people, NGOs and small > companies are also > > cut off. > > > > This seems to skirt the edge of 'do no evil'. > > > > I thought it was interesting and friendly, that DigitalGlobe openly > > referred me to their competitor GeoEye (Space Imaging > Ikonos/OrbImage > > OrbView). > > > > In this particular case, DigitalGlobe (QuickBird) has the > only hi-res > > cloud-free image in existence for my part of the world > (Hawaii). So i > > cannot go to any other source. > > > > -Ben > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: DigitalGlobe Customer Service [mailto:info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > > Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2006 5:13 AM > > To: Ben Discoe > > Subject: RE: Licensing image catalog ID 10100100018E8E01 > > > > Hi Ben, > > > > You are correct in what you say below. Google has signed > an exclusive > > agreement with us to display our full-resolution imagery on the web.
Loading Comments...
Home | News | Patents | Sitemap | FAQ | advertise

Advertising by