|
Re: Assertions in CoordinateArraySequence: msg#00112gis.geos.devel
strk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 11:23:26AM +0200, Mateusz Loskot wrote: >> strk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: >>> On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 08:42:28AM +0200, Mateusz Loskot wrote: >>>> strk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: >>>>> On Mon, Jun 26, 2006 at 08:38:57PM +0200, Mateusz Loskot wrote: >>>>>> Charlie Savage wrote: >>>>>>> Anyway, as we discussed yesterday, I'm happy with "safe" versions >>>>>>> of these methods. Strk, what do you think? >>>>>> Yeah, strk what do you think? >>>>>> >>>>>> This would start implementing my secret plan to follow STL >>>>>> interface design, heh :-))) >>>>> It's completely fine with me following STL interface design, as long >>>>> as it's Mateusz doing it :D >>>> Hmm, are you sure you want me to do it? >>>> It could break current design and JTS compatibility - same classes layout. >>> No no! Was just talking about exception-throwing duplicates of elements >>> access functions. No much fun. >> >> OK, do you want me to do it, to add those checked calls? > > If you think anyone would be using them, feel free to > add the new methods. I wouldn't change any existing call > though. OK Cheers -- Mateusz Loskot http://mateusz.loskot.net |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Assertions in CoordinateArraySequence: 00112, strk |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: initGEOS/finishGEOS and multiple subsystems: 00112, strk |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Assertions in CoordinateArraySequencei: 00112, strk |
| Next by Thread: | Geos - multithreading and error handling: 00112, Charlie Savage |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |