|
Re: Assertions in CoordinateArraySequence: msg#00111gis.geos.devel
On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 11:23:26AM +0200, Mateusz Loskot wrote: > strk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 08:42:28AM +0200, Mateusz Loskot wrote: > >> strk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > >>> On Mon, Jun 26, 2006 at 08:38:57PM +0200, Mateusz Loskot wrote: > >>>> Charlie Savage wrote: > >>>>> Anyway, as we discussed yesterday, I'm happy with "safe" versions > >>>>> of these methods. Strk, what do you think? > >>>> Yeah, strk what do you think? > >>>> > >>>> This would start implementing my secret plan to follow STL > >>>> interface design, heh :-))) > >>> It's completely fine with me following STL interface design, as long > >>> as it's Mateusz doing it :D > >> Hmm, are you sure you want me to do it? > >> It could break current design and JTS compatibility - same classes layout. > > > > No no! Was just talking about exception-throwing duplicates of elements > > access functions. No much fun. > > > OK, do you want me to do it, to add those checked calls? If you think anyone would be using them, feel free to add the new methods. I wouldn't change any existing call though. --strk; |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: initGEOS/finishGEOS and multiple subsystems: 00111, Mateusz Loskot |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Assertions in CoordinateArraySequence: 00111, Mateusz Loskot |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Assertions in CoordinateArraySequencei: 00111, Mateusz Loskot |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Assertions in CoordinateArraySequence: 00111, Mateusz Loskot |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |