|
Re: initGEOS/finishGEOS and multiple subsystems: msg#00109gis.geos.devel
strk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 10:30:21PM +0200, Mateusz Loskot wrote: >> strk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: >>> With GEOS-3.0.0 initGEOS/finishGEOS do not instantiate/delete a >>> GeometryFactory anymore. Rather the default GeometryFactory is >>> used. This should fix the problem. >> What about backport to 2.2.x with ref-counted proposal? Such >> changes could would not affect existing code. > > Ok with me. > >> I'd like to repeat that in general, global factory should be >> replaced with shared object (e.g. managed by shared_ptr from Boost >> or our own home-made shared smart pointer). static factory can >> cause problems too: >> http://www.parashift.com/c++-faq-lite/ctors.html#faq-10.12 > > We're using "construct on first use" idiom if I'm not wrong (see faq > 10.13). Yes, we are. But we still need to be careful: http://www.parashift.com/c++-faq-lite/ctors.html#faq-10.14 Cheers -- Mateusz Loskot http://mateusz.loskot.net |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | initGEOS/finishGEOS and multiple subsystems: 00109, Howard Butler |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: initGEOS/finishGEOS and multiple subsystems: 00109, Mateusz Loskot |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: initGEOS/finishGEOS and multiple subsystemsi: 00109, strk |
| Next by Thread: | Re: initGEOS/finishGEOS and multiple subsystems: 00109, strk |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |