|
Re: Assertions in CoordinateArraySequence: msg#00107gis.geos.devel
strk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 08:42:28AM +0200, Mateusz Loskot wrote: >> strk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: >>> On Mon, Jun 26, 2006 at 08:38:57PM +0200, Mateusz Loskot wrote: >>>> Charlie Savage wrote: >>>>> Anyway, as we discussed yesterday, I'm happy with "safe" versions >>>>> of these methods. Strk, what do you think? >>>> Yeah, strk what do you think? >>>> >>>> This would start implementing my secret plan to follow STL >>>> interface design, heh :-))) >>> It's completely fine with me following STL interface design, as long >>> as it's Mateusz doing it :D >> Hmm, are you sure you want me to do it? >> It could break current design and JTS compatibility - same classes layout. > > No no! Was just talking about exception-throwing duplicates of elements > access functions. No much fun. OK, do you want me to do it, to add those checked calls? Cheers -- Mateusz Loskot http://mateusz.loskot.net |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Some C API Issues: 00107, Mateusz Loskot |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | initGEOS/finishGEOS and multiple subsystems: 00107, Howard Butler |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Assertions in CoordinateArraySequencei: 00107, strk |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Assertions in CoordinateArraySequence: 00107, strk |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |