|
Re: initGEOS/finishGEOS and multiple subsystems: msg#00103gis.geos.devel
On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 10:30:21PM +0200, Mateusz Loskot wrote: > strk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > With GEOS-3.0.0 initGEOS/finishGEOS do not instantiate/delete > > a GeometryFactory anymore. Rather the default GeometryFactory > > is used. This should fix the problem. > > What about backport to 2.2.x with ref-counted proposal? > Such changes could would not affect existing code. Ok with me. > I'd like to repeat that in general, global factory should be replaced > with shared object (e.g. managed by shared_ptr from Boost or our own > home-made shared smart pointer). > static factory can cause problems too: > http://www.parashift.com/c++-faq-lite/ctors.html#faq-10.12 We're using "construct on first use" idiom if I'm not wrong (see faq 10.13). --strk; |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: initGEOS/finishGEOS and multiple subsystems: 00103, Mateusz Loskot |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: initGEOS/finishGEOS and multiple subsystems: 00103, Frank Warmerdam |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: initGEOS/finishGEOS and multiple subsystemsi: 00103, Mateusz Loskot |
| Next by Thread: | Re: initGEOS/finishGEOS and multiple subsystems: 00103, Mateusz Loskot |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |