|
Re: Assertions in CoordinateArraySequence: msg#00081gis.geos.devel
Charlie Savage wrote: >> Please, see exactly what I've written: hundreds/thousands and >> milions of iterations. > > Mateusz - I read exactly what you wrote. Please don't question my > ability to read, I don't think its conductive to a good discussion. Charlie, Forgive me my impoliteness, I didn't want you to understand it that way. It wasn't my goal to question your ability to read. Simply, I had an impression that your reply considers single if, as "imagining an if statement". That's why I decided to underline the sense of my post. >> Here is my small benchmark measured with callgrind: >> http://mateusz.loskot.net/tmp/perf.png Here you have much more >> professional benchmarks that proof the same: >> http://groups.google.pl/group/misc.test/browse_frm/thread/19f69cead14a07e2/ >> >> >> >> > > Excellent, thanks for the pointers, these certainly prove the point > and answer my question. I'm happy to hear it. > Anyway, as we discussed yesterday, I'm happy with "safe" versions of > these methods. Strk, what do you think? Yeah, strk what do you think? This would start implementing my secret plan to follow STL interface design, heh :-))) Cheers -- Mateusz Loskot http://mateusz.loskot.net |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Assertions in CoordinateArraySequence: 00081, strk |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Assertions in CoordinateArraySequence: 00081, Charlie Savage |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Assertions in CoordinateArraySequencei: 00081, strk |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Assertions in CoordinateArraySequence: 00081, strk |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |