Re: Toward GEOS-3.0.0RC

Is that 1 to 2 weeks or half a week?

Out of curiosity, any changes in performance (either good or bad)?

Charlie

strk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 04:16:22PM -0600, Charlie Savage wrote:
> > Yeah, was planning on doing that.  What's the timeframe you're looking at?
>
> In 1/2 weeks I'd like to release an RC pack, if I handle to make it
> acceptable as a version number for automake's taste.
>
> --strk;
>
> > I did a pretty big update for GEOS 3.0 about 2 months ago, but I imagine 
> > things have changed a lot since then.  So it might take a bit of time to 
> > get right.  Having the new unit tests around helps for sure though (can 
> > copy them to Ruby/Python as needed).
> >
> >
> > Charlie
> >
> > strk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > > Since we're talking about this, I'm in the process of closing
> > > up the 3.0.0 release. Charlie, could you give the swig/ bit
> > > a check ? If things get complicated we can rollback to the 2.x
> > > way of only distributing files with no attempt to automatically
> > > build.
> _______________________________________________
> geos-devel mailing list
> geos-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://geos.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

_______________________________________________
geos-devel mailing list
geos-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://geos.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel