On Tue, 2005-12-13 at 13:42 -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-12-13 at 11:01 -0600, Mikey wrote:
> > On Tuesday 13 December 2005 09:56, Chris Gianelloni spammed:
> >
> > > Why is this crap even a discussion? Did anyone bother to even *READ* my
> > > response?
> >
> > I read your response and understood that you fixed it in cvs.
>
> ...and?
>
> "All Nvidia cards should be using capitals. It very well could be the
> pci.ids being shipped with the pciutils ebuild causing the issue."
>
> At no point did I say, or even infer that the pci.ids file is not
> showing nv40, I just mentioned that it shouldn't. There really wasn't a
> point for continuing to point out examples, which was my reasoning
> behind asking if anyone actually read my response. Since everyone
> seemed to focus on my committing a fix for the "bug" into CVS, it is
> apparent that nobody did read it very well.
>
> Again, this really isn't the place, as such things belong in a bug
> report. However, there's no need for a report since it has already been
> resolved. I apologize for being short, I just hate having to repeat
> myself when this "conversation" is completely superfluous had attention
> been paid to what I originally responded.
>
ok, sorry for all :) I have made a Debian bug report against pciutils
and maybe it will be forwarded upstream
Thanks
Nicolas
|
