|
osdir.com mailing list archive |
|
Subject: [Fedora-sparc] Package: librra-0.14-1.fc12 Tag: None Status: complete Built by: ausil - msg#11494List: generalTag: None Status: complete Built by: ausil ID: 36166 Started: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 17:47:58 UTC Finished: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 17:59:06 UTC Changelog: * Tue Jul 21 2009 Andreas Bierfert <andreas.bierfert[AT]lowlatency.de> - 0.14-1 - version upgrade * Wed Feb 25 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> - 0.13-2 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild * Sun Feb 08 2009 Andreas Bierfert <andreas.bierfert[AT]lowlatency.de> - 0.13-1 - version upgrade (#457949) - remove patch SRPMS: librra-0.14-1.fc12.src.rpm Closed tasks: ------------- Task 268625 on korolev.ausil.us Task Type: build (None, librra-0.14-1.fc12.src.rpm) Task 268626 on daedalus.ausil.us Task Type: buildArch (librra-0.14-1.fc12.src.rpm, sparc64) logs: http://sparc.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=268626&name=build.log http://sparc.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=268626&name=root.log http://sparc.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=268626&name=state.log rpms: http://sparc.koji.fedoraproject.org/packages/librra/0.14/1.fc12/sparc64/librra-0.14-1.fc12.sparc64.rpm http://sparc.koji.fedoraproject.org/packages/librra/0.14/1.fc12/sparc64/librra-debuginfo-0.14-1.fc12.sparc64.rpm http://sparc.koji.fedoraproject.org/packages/librra/0.14/1.fc12/sparc64/librra-devel-0.14-1.fc12.sparc64.rpm http://sparc.koji.fedoraproject.org/packages/librra/0.14/1.fc12/sparc64/python-rra-0.14-1.fc12.sparc64.rpm Task 268627 on daedalus.ausil.us Task Type: buildArch (librra-0.14-1.fc12.src.rpm, sparcv9) logs: http://sparc.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=268627&name=build.log http://sparc.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=268627&name=root.log http://sparc.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=268627&name=state.log rpms: http://sparc.koji.fedoraproject.org/packages/librra/0.14/1.fc12/sparcv9/librra-0.14-1.fc12.sparcv9.rpm http://sparc.koji.fedoraproject.org/packages/librra/0.14/1.fc12/sparcv9/librra-debuginfo-0.14-1.fc12.sparcv9.rpm http://sparc.koji.fedoraproject.org/packages/librra/0.14/1.fc12/sparcv9/librra-devel-0.14-1.fc12.sparcv9.rpm http://sparc.koji.fedoraproject.org/packages/librra/0.14/1.fc12/sparcv9/python-rra-0.14-1.fc12.sparcv9.rpm Task Info: http://sparc.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=268625 Build Info: http://sparc.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=36166 _______________________________________________ sparc mailing list sparc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/sparc Thread at a glance:
Previous Message by Date: click to view message preview[Bug c/41867] Translation time Floating Point precision is too small------- Comment #4 from tydeman at tybor dot com 2009-10-31 17:42 ------- The requirement that translation time precision be at least as great as runtime precision existed in C89, C90, C95, and C99 (so has been around for 20 years). My code is a test of translation time precision versus runtime precision. The first code I saw in bug 323 involved 3 auto variables (so is just runtime). That is a different issue, so I believe that this bug is not a duplicate of 323. I used gnu99 instead of c99 for the std because I also am testing Decimal FP in addition to Binary FP. Where should I find documentation on compiler options to get as close to C99 conformance as possible? Also, C99 + Decimal FP conformance? The output you show is what I expected. -- tydeman at tybor dot com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |UNCONFIRMED Resolution|DUPLICATE | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41867 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-REQUEST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Next Message by Date: click to view message preview./packages/openofficeorg/3.1.1/unstable r1741: updating ooo-build (still for 3.1.1-6)------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 1741 committer: Rene Engelhard <rene@xxxxxxxxxx> branch nick: unstable timestamp: Sat 2009-10-31 18:59:22 +0100 message: updating ooo-build (still for 3.1.1-6) modified: changelog === modified file 'changelog' --- a/changelog 2009-10-31 16:59:53 +0000 +++ b/changelog 2009-10-31 17:59:22 +0000 @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ [ Rene Engelhard ] * ooo-build: - - update (390b0ce544dfca09e36d6cf4f03f7d12b988af87) + - update (8a4d08ec440c3c5eaf664b5732eb79d2c6ed9896) - fixes wrong filter texts in KDE4 fpicker (closes: #551774) - Correct fix for the mirrored range selection bug in RTL mode. (closes: #548767) @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ * debian/po: - update ru.po, tr.po - -- Rene Engelhard <rene@xxxxxxxxxx> Sat, 31 Oct 2009 09:56:17 +0100 + -- Rene Engelhard <rene@xxxxxxxxxx> Sat, 31 Oct 2009 18:57:35 +0100 openoffice.org (1:3.1.1-5) unstable; urgency=low Previous Message by Thread: click to view message preview[Bug c/41867] Translation time Floating Point precision is too small------- Comment #4 from tydeman at tybor dot com 2009-10-31 17:42 ------- The requirement that translation time precision be at least as great as runtime precision existed in C89, C90, C95, and C99 (so has been around for 20 years). My code is a test of translation time precision versus runtime precision. The first code I saw in bug 323 involved 3 auto variables (so is just runtime). That is a different issue, so I believe that this bug is not a duplicate of 323. I used gnu99 instead of c99 for the std because I also am testing Decimal FP in addition to Binary FP. Where should I find documentation on compiler options to get as close to C99 conformance as possible? Also, C99 + Decimal FP conformance? The output you show is what I expected. -- tydeman at tybor dot com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |UNCONFIRMED Resolution|DUPLICATE | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41867 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-REQUEST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Next Message by Thread: click to view message preview./packages/openofficeorg/3.1.1/unstable r1741: updating ooo-build (still for 3.1.1-6)------------------------------------------------------------ revno: 1741 committer: Rene Engelhard <rene@xxxxxxxxxx> branch nick: unstable timestamp: Sat 2009-10-31 18:59:22 +0100 message: updating ooo-build (still for 3.1.1-6) modified: changelog === modified file 'changelog' --- a/changelog 2009-10-31 16:59:53 +0000 +++ b/changelog 2009-10-31 17:59:22 +0000 @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ [ Rene Engelhard ] * ooo-build: - - update (390b0ce544dfca09e36d6cf4f03f7d12b988af87) + - update (8a4d08ec440c3c5eaf664b5732eb79d2c6ed9896) - fixes wrong filter texts in KDE4 fpicker (closes: #551774) - Correct fix for the mirrored range selection bug in RTL mode. (closes: #548767) @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ * debian/po: - update ru.po, tr.po - -- Rene Engelhard <rene@xxxxxxxxxx> Sat, 31 Oct 2009 09:56:17 +0100 + -- Rene Engelhard <rene@xxxxxxxxxx> Sat, 31 Oct 2009 18:57:35 +0100 openoffice.org (1:3.1.1-5) unstable; urgency=low Loading Comments...
|
|
