On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 12:32:20PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> >On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 12:08:37AM -0800, Joel Brobecker wrote:
> >
> >>This also gives me the opportunity to announce that the HP/UX target
> >>is important for ACT, and that we will do the work necessary to keep
> >>this port in good shape. My first goal for this platform is to make it
> >>at least multiarch partial.
> >
> >
> >Well! Your timing is good; I've been waiting for a response from
> >Andrew for my last attempt to remove the HP/UX bits entirely. But if
> >someone's going to do the work than I don't need to push for that.
> >This is good news.
> >
> >Joel, is there any chance that ACT could provide outside GDB developers
> >with access to an HP/UX system? That would make it much easier not to
> >break HP/UX (and to figure out what works on HP/UX now at all).
> >
> >HP provides a number of Test Drive programs, which seem to cover
> >everything HP/Compaq has ever offered _except_ for HP/UX.
>
> It does. It's got:
>
> HP-UX 11i 11.22 on i2000 Itanium i2000 2@750MHz
> HP-UX 11i 11.11 on rp2470 PA RISC rp2470 2@750MHz
> HP-UX 11i 11.11 on rp5470 PA RISC rp5470 4@550MHz
>
> but the two PA RISC machines are still down from the move. ETA is
> apparently ``later today''.
Could you point me at information on HP's web site about these? I
couldn't find it.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
|
