Re: [RFA/RFC] blockframe.c Fix errorneous addr check

On Jun 27, 10:58pm, Andrew Volkov wrote:

> >>    current_source_end_addr = start_addr + size;
> >> 
> >> but must be:
> >> 
> >>    current_source_end_addr = start_addr + size + <addr sizeof>;
> >> 
> >> As I understand, since machine address size is not known at 
> >time of parsing 
> >> coff file, then we have big trouble :(.
> >
> >Could you explain why you need to add in the size of an address?
> 
> It's not necessarily must be addr sizeof, it may be 1, but, I think,
> will be better, if current_source_end_addr will contain correct 
> value for target.

What I'd like to understand is why (start_addr + size) is insufficient.
I.e, why do we need to add 1 or some other small value to compute the
correct ending address?

Kevin