|
Re: Vendor ID Field is Sign Extended: msg#00919freeradius.user
"Jacob S. Barrett" <jbarrett@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I changed that structure and all seems to work. Can you forsee anything > that might fail now that it is unsigned? Some compile-time warnings, and maybe other signed/unsigned issues. Fixing the VENDOR macro is the smallest change which solves the problem, and which has no other side effects. Alan DeKok. - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Unknown Value NAS_ATTR in dictionary.usrs: 00919, Suresh Pinnamaneni |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: LEAP exchanges: 00919, Alan DeKok |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Vendor ID Field is Sign Extendedi: 00919, Jacob S. Barrett |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Vendor ID Field is Sign Extended: 00919, Miquel van Smoorenburg |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |