|
Re: Vendor ID Field is Sign Extended: msg#00905freeradius.user
Alan DeKok wrote: The 'attribute' entry in the VALUE_PAIR structure should really be I changed that structure and all seems to work. Can you forsee anything that might fail now that it is unsigned? This really isn't a big deal to me since I can just pick a lower vendor number. I was just pulling one out of the air and thought I would do 65k and BOOM. They are only registered up to 17425 right now so you have some time to fix it... :) Thanks, Jake -- Jacob S. Barrett jbarrett@xxxxxxxxxx www.amduat.net "I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it." - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Vendor ID Field is Sign Extended: 00905, Jacob S. Barrett |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: ask about SQL Counter disconnect dialup users: 00905, Salavat Yalalov |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Vendor ID Field is Sign Extendedi: 00905, Alan DeKok |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Vendor ID Field is Sign Extended: 00905, Alan DeKok |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |