logo       

Re: Make cookie for XDM-AUTHORIZATION-1 more unique: msg#00016

freedesktop.xlibs.general

Subject: Re: Make cookie for XDM-AUTHORIZATION-1 more unique

On Thu, May 13, 2004 at 06:10:40PM +0200, Egbert Eich wrote:
> Sergey V. Udaltsov writes:
> > > It doesn't matter who implements it, it's all about distribution. And
> > > not being able to export it from the US (e.g. if I wget it) without
> > What an idiocity.
> >
> > > telling the BXA gets really ugly. That's why you need to do a single
> > > export to a foreign server, complete with automated BXA notification,
> > > and then have *everyone* get it from there; everything else is
> > > impractical.
> >
> > Sorry for asking. I did not realize things are THAT bad in US.
>
> I did not know either. I recall faintly that I was told differently,
> but I don't remember the details.

I just ran it by some Debian guys, and they confirmed it was correct.
Looking back, you could obviously do multiple exports with multiple BXA
notifications, but that's horribly inefficient.

:) d

--
Daniel Stone
<daniel-CC+yJ3UmIYoUP7JLjWt5Lw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
freedesktop.org: powering your desktop http://www.freedesktop.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
xlibs mailing list
xlibs-CC+yJ3UmIYqDUpFQwHEjaQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xlibs
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Google Custom Search

News | FAQ | advertise