|
Re: [Xorg] DocBook SGML/XML manual pages...: msg#00021freedesktop.release-wranglers
Keith Packard writes: > > Around 0 o'clock on May 6, Roland Mainz wrote: > > > Does anyone know if there is already a way to handle Unix manual pages > > in DocBook/{SGML|XML} format ? There are now a couple of DocBook manual > > pages in the tree and I'd like to add more, but IMHO we need some > > official way to handle such stuff then... > > I don't think there are imake rules to handle docbook files. However, we > should start incorporating the autotool build files into the X.Org tree, > and we should certainly find a way to deal with docbook files in that > environment. > > Egbert suggested that perhaps we might like to create a common set of > autotool macros for us to share across multiple modules; perhaps rules for > docbook would be a good candidate for inclusion in that module. > That is certainly true. And it will convince me that we will not loose a feature that I found very importand in Imake ;-) However we should also proceed with our discussions about a future documentation standard. If we add files now and agree on a different standard in the future we will have to do more conversions than we already have to do now. Egbert. |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: "Monolithic" vs. "modular" build / was: Re: [Xorg] DocBook SGML/XML: 00021, Egbert Eich |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: X.Org Foundation - Release Call - 3rd May 2004: 00021, Daniel Stone |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: "Monolithic" vs. "modular" build / was: Re: [Xorg] DocBook SGML/XMLi: 00021, Egbert Eich |
| Next by Thread: | Xanax (Pharmacia)1mg 90 Tabs SPECIAL !!! ))) gzlcjycqxv zunfbgc: 00021, Mamie Summers |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |