On Mon, 2005-10-24 at 20:07 +0200, Julien PUYDT wrote:
> John (J5) Palmieri a écrit :
> > I was thinking of adding it as an annotation. In fact python can do
> > this without spec changes if we want to. We eventually wanted to have
> > it so you could do print proxy_obj.__doc__ and get documentation. The
> > biggest problem is bandwidth. Good documentation can easily become
> > bigger than the introspect data itself. Do we want to go down that
> > road?
>
> I was thinking about that when you asked about seeing the dbus interface
> for gnomemeeting 2.0 in introspection form... I realized that my current
> file also documents what the arguments are, and what the method
> call/signal is about.
>
> The introspection xml loses that.
Anyone can add an annotation to their introspect format. The format
needs to be a good citizen however and not pass megabytes of info over
the wire :-)
--
John (J5) Palmieri <johnp-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
_______________________________________________
dbus mailing list
dbus-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dbus
|
