Re: match on args patch

On Wed, 2005-07-27 at 15:19 -0400, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> This adds arg3='foo' capability to match rules. Only supports args of
> type STRING for now.
> 
> Missing test coverage on the actual matching code, which would have to
> be added prior to commit.
> 
> Would be helpful if someone could look for bugs (or comment on the
> concept though I think we already discussed it some).

Havoc super hacker comes back from managment land ;-)

I'll look to adding some tests.  Why are we just matching on strings?
Do we want to match on other basic types and marshal the match based on
the arguments signiture at some point?

-- 
John (J5) Palmieri <johnp-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>