On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 02:34:18PM +0200, Marc Fonvieille wrote:
> > Modified files:
> > en/marketing os-comparison.sgml
> > Log:
> > Update the OS Comparison article.
> >
> > PR: www/82761 http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=82761
>
> This update disturbs me. By mentioning CERT advisories without an OS
> separation gives me the feeling that the document is missing its
> objective. Why not just give a link to CERT advisories list then?
> The previous "CERT Advisories in 2000 that affected Linux" and "CERT
> Advisories in 2000 that affected Windows" parts were an interesting
> advocacy argument. I don't think phpBB or Oracle vulns well push people
> to use FreeBSD, etc.
Yes, I agree that a full list of CERT advisories of the last year is
less useful than the several years old breakdown of CERT advisories
grouped by affected operating system.
Also, surely such information is provided via XML somewhere and so if
it was desired it should be automatically syndicated, not copied in to
this document manually.
- Murray
_______________________________________________
cvs-doc@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-doc
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "cvs-doc-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
|
