logo       

Re: was this really necessary?: msg#00578

Subject: Re: was this really necessary?
"Jason T. Nelson" wrote:
> In our last exciting episode, rob spellberg (emailrob@xxxxxxxxxxxx) said:
> > i read that you are big on the "right to free speech".
> > i do so hate to get legalistic on you and
> >   i am not being the least bit faux here but,
> >   in the usa, it's actually a "privilege".
> > that's because our constitution has an amendment process.
> > our much ballyhooed first amendment --is-- repealable.
> > all it takes is for 2/3 each of our house and senate and
> >   3/4 of our states to think that
> >   "it seemed like a good idea at the time."
> 
> And this is particularly why we have the 2nd amendment; the second the US
> federal government tries this is the day I march on Washington armed to
> defend my rights as defined in our Constitution (and I wouldn't be alone, I
> assure you). I doubt you could seriously consider that Congress attempting
> this stupidity as "representing" our citizens' interests.

The Constitution does not grant these rights; it merely
acknowledges them.  Look up "inalienable".  8-) 8-).

-- Terry

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx
with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>