logo       

Re: was this really necessary?: msg#00575

Subject: Re: was this really necessary?
In our last exciting episode, rob spellberg (emailrob@xxxxxxxxxxxx) said:
> i read that you are big on the "right to free speech".
> i do so hate to get legalistic on you and
>   i am not being the least bit faux here but,
>   in the usa, it's actually a "privilege".
> that's because our constitution has an amendment process.
> our much ballyhooed first amendment --is-- repealable.
> all it takes is for 2/3 each of our house and senate and
>   3/4 of our states to think that
>   "it seemed like a good idea at the time."

And this is particularly why we have the 2nd amendment; the second the US
federal government tries this is the day I march on Washington armed to
defend my rights as defined in our Constitution (and I wouldn't be alone, I
assure you). I doubt you could seriously consider that Congress attempting 
this stupidity as "representing" our citizens' interests.

> just think:  if it wasn't for that pesky first amendment,
>   we could finally pass a meaningful "hate speech code".

I really, REALLY, hope you are joking here.
 
-- 
Jason T. Nelson <jtn@xxxxxx>                     http://www.jtn.cx/~jtn/
BOFH Extraordiaire & Sysadmin Ombudsman               GPG key 0xFF676C9E
GPG key fingerprint = 6272 5482 EDDD D0A3 FED2  262A FABB 599D FF67 6C9E
disclaimer: My opinions are my own. Don't bother my employer about them.

Attachment: pgpxUAMPAFY22.pgp
Description: PGP signature

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>