|
Re: generating correct sfnt ttf files: msg#00041fonts.fontforge.user
On Tue, 2006-08-29 at 12:29, mpsuzuki@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > I was not thinking the issue were bug. I think it's incompatibility > of expected bitmap font design/handling among fontconfig, freetype2, > and fontforge. > Please wait 24 hours for detailed analysis of the issue OK. > No, freetype2 sets FT_FACE_FLAG_SCALABLE when there is > glyf or CFF tables are included, even if they includes > only gid=0 fallback glyph. Depending on how the sfnt was created, this might be the problem. FontForge will not create a 'glyf' (or 'CFF ' or 'typ1') table if it is creating an OpenType Bitmap, or an "sbits only dfont", but if Qianqian selected "In TTF" with no outline font, FontForge produces something designed to fool windows into accepting the font -- that means it has a 'glyf' table with a bunch of empty glyphs, and an EBSC table that maps all pixel sizes to one of the supplied sizes. I hope that's what happened. In which case the solution is probably just to generate an OpenType Bitmap ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | [Fwd: [OFL-discuss] OSDL DTL Tech Board: Fonts & Linux (Thu, Aug 31)]: 00041, George Williams |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: generating correct sfnt ttf files: 00041, mpsuzuki |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: generating correct sfnt ttf filesi: 00041, mpsuzuki |
| Next by Thread: | Re: generating correct sfnt ttf files: 00041, mpsuzuki |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |