Re: Invisible gold :)

Probably the best thing to do here would be to read the actual patent
filing. If the "scientist's" claims are vague enough, he may simply be
trying to prevent anyone else from ever releasing anything like it.

Of course, this might be a moot point, since it's a bit of a known trick
to never actually allow a patent to be finalised, but rather keep it
"patent pending", because your idea is still protected, but you can keep
changing and adding to your patent claims as you wish (apparently some
people/companies do this to help squash potential competitors).


> 
> I'm still suspicious.
> 
> 
> -- Patrick