Subject: RE: Feedback about GOLD-CASH.BIZ from a VERY unhappy "old client" - msg#00384

Previous Message by Date: click to view message preview

Domain name - Trademark issues!

Hello everyone! Am sure it musbe a relief to see a posting by me about something other than my e-Gold accounts, DDU, and stuff! :) Anyways, theres this issue on trademarks and domains, that I am a bit confused about and could do with some clarification! Basically, its like this: Can I fight a trademark registrant over a particular trademark, if I can prove that I was using that same trademarked name for a very similar business, prior to him? Would that qualify to be 'un-registered trademark'? Something like that? Robert - Divin told me you might have some info on this. So, would be obliged if you could enlighten me on the same! Thanks! Ajay admin-S1hMw5E6qnryG1zEObXtfA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Next Message by Date: click to view message preview

Re: Bogus = junk -- deal with it.

> The fact that you are making excuses trying to split hairs between > the meanings of bogus & junk is evidence of what I said before. Am not making EXCUSES! Am putting across a point, that should have sunk in, long back, but it just isnt! Also, I was hoping you would use softer words on me, than BOGUS and BOGOSITY! But, JRM, alias 'evil-moderator' of e-Gold moderator probably considers any sort of 'acceptance' as totally unacceptable! > Rules DO apply. They especially apply to _YOU_ if you think they I never disagreed! AND, I never said I thought they dunt apply to me! > somehow don't/shouldn't apply to you. Deal with it and comply, > or go away. I don't really care that much, to be perfectly honest. Do you really care about anything, that relates to anyone else? I doubt it! Maybe its e-Golds leading position in the DGC industry that leads to such kind of contemptuous behaviour to customers? Obviously 'customer is always right' doesnt hold good here, but atleast 'customer is sometimes right' should! > You need to concentrate on YOUR OWN behavior, and making it > comply with the agreement you supposedly agreed-to when you > clicked. And yes, FAKE OR BOGUS information looks criminal to > e-gold, and I don't blame them ONE BIT for what they did in this > case. If anything, your responses have strengthened that feeling > on my part, because you refuse to take responsibility for your > own behavior, and instead seem to wish to talk about anything- > else. Take responsibility, comply with what you agreed-to, and > this noise-generating issue will go away. You dunt get it! I openly admit I made a mistake! And that I am going to do as per what the e-Gold DDU suggest and proceed with whatever you required! But you on the other hand, just keep bringing back the same thing again and again! BOGUS =! JUNK I put JUNK info, broke the agreement. I got the value limit. Fine! Accepted! But it really isnt necessary to repeatedly keep using BOGUS/BOGOSITY, when I have brought to your KIND (that really dusnt seem to exist around around here. maybe you should check what that means, coz am sure it aint in your dictionary! hehe) attention that BOGUS and JUNK are 2 different things! Or like Gordon mentioned: Is it this? ------------------------------------------ Not to mention that netpay is more or less a competitor of theirs. It is in their best interest to make Ajay look like a bad person indeed. ------------------------------------------ And yeah, knowing you, you are probably gonna go, 'I dunt care what you or anyone else thinks, etc etc!'. It definitely isnt without reason that you were termed 'evil-moderator'! They should have probably included the following adjectives too: contemptuous, scornful, indifferent, stubborn, apathetic and many more similar ones! lol :) No offence, JMR, but you really really are not much of PR guy! Atleast I think that way! Not that you need to be, but I feel it could help! BTW, does e-Gold have anything of that sort? PR? Ajay admin-S1hMw5E6qnryG1zEObXtfA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx PS: I dunt know if anyone else finds any humour in this, but, I am really beginning to think of this as a big joke, gone wrong! (I can imagine what JMR would say - We dunt take our TOS, as a joke! lol)

Previous Message by Thread: click to view message preview

Feedback about GOLD-CASH.BIZ from a VERY unhappy "old client"

Good morning, I am what can be called "an old client" of Gold-cash, and so thought - what a mistake - that I could get a good Service from them. Last Thursday, I sent $2,500 e-gold to Gold-Cash, to receive a bank transfer. Julie emailed me on Friday (one week ago) "The wire has been sent". It takes usually 3 business days to reach the destination, so the wire should have arrived Wednesday, or at least Thursday (yesterday). On Wednesday I emailed Julie, asking if the problems of the website (the website disappeared 4 days from the internet, the admin "forgot" to renew the domain name registration ...!!) could delay the wire. The reply was "I will check with my bank, BUT AS WE ARE GOING TO EASTER HOLIDAYS, I WILL NOT REPLY TO YOU QUICKLY" ! Happy that these people go on holidays, maybe with my gold ... ? NO other new since this mail. The wire didn't arrive, I even tried to call Miss Julie on the phone number that is on this website, this is a mobile phone in Latvia, and it is (of course !) always OFFline ! A good way to not have to listen the unhappy clients. Now Friday evening, NO WIRE ON THE RECEIVER'S ACCOUNT. Miss Julie is probably on Easter vacation, all is right ! Miss Julie, if during your Easter holidays you have the time to read this message, I just ask you to send the gold back to my account. NO wire has arrived, my bank has checked. It very probably means that NO wire has been SENT. That is why I am waiting the gold back. I am going to ask a Latvian lawyer to fill a complaint against your company if the case isn't solved BEFORE NEXT WEDNESDAY. I just add that a few people complaint on the gold-atm.biz forum, and that the messages are quickly removed... Here at least, it won't be so! Lucien

Next Message by Thread: click to view message preview

RE: Feedback about GOLD-CASH.BIZ from a VERY unhappy "old client"

Dear Julie, > I am indeed on easter holidays and was unable to answer you as soon as you > would have liked, and although I am sorry about the delay, Easter being > public holidays and having also sent you an email before stating that, I do > not think that you should find this surprising. > > I have answered you elsewhere - your wire is coming, from a different > account this time, because it could not get through. I assume that, as banks are closed since Friday, you knew this on Thursday. If you would have informed me (as you promised to do), I would have been able to understand! > What you forgot to mention was that we have made 4-5 transactions for you in > the past without problems and also that you have asked us to provide a > transfer from a personal account, which is not something we usually do and > which means more work for us. And a higher fee, that compensates the mor work. But this is normal! The point is that you sent the wire on last Friday (10 days ago), as you told me. Wednesday I asked you as I fell there was a problem, and... and nothing but "holidays", despite that you KNEW that your account had an internet limit. About the passed transactions, I just told here that I was an "old client", people are IMO clever enough to understand that I was happy of your service if I continued to try to work with you. > Please also remember, that due to Easter holidays Latvian banks don't work > until Tuesday, so the wire would not go as far as you might expect. I am also able to understand this, but I expect that the wire has ALREADY left Latvia, since you know there was a problem.... Anyway the problem is, once more, that it seems too hard for some people to just send an email to IN-FORM their clients. In any case, I wish you and everybody else on the list a happy Easter! Lucien